Nearly one month ago, I set out to outline the case against the Bell coalition’s website blocking plan. Sixteen instalments later (plus bonus posts on Bell’s astroturfing campaign and the remarkable success of the day of action opposing the plan), I have examined the myriad of problems with the proposal. The objective was never to justify piracy. Rather, it was to conclusively demonstrate that the proposal is disproportionate, harmful, offside international standards, violates Canadian norms, and does not come close to meeting the CRTC’s requirements for approval of website blocking. This post summarizes the key points for each of these five sources of concern. The CRTC is accepting interventions until March 29th, leaving Canadians with several more weeks to speak out to the Commission, their Member of Parliament, and the Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains.
Archive for March 8th, 2018

Law Bytes
Episode 167: Inside My Senate Committee Appearance on the Many Risks of Bill C-18
byMichael Geist

May 15, 2023
Michael Geist
May 1, 2023
Michael Geist
April 24, 2023
Michael Geist
April 17, 2023
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
CRTC Chair Vicky Eatrides Faces Her First Big Test: Is the Commission Serious About Public Participation on Bill C-11?
Ready, Fire, Aim: Eleven Thoughts on the CRTC’s Bill C-11 Consultations
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 167: Inside My Senate Committee Appearance on the Many Risks of Bill C-18
The Government’s Epic Bill C-18 Miscalculation on Mandating Payments for Links
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 166: Colin Bennett on How the Government Is the Using the Budget Implementation Act to Weaken the Privacy Rules for Political Parties