The Bell website blocking coalition has consistently argued their plan is similar to those found in other countries that have permitted website blocking. As I detailed in my lengthy series on the proposal, it is actually an outlier, since the absence of court orders for blocking puts it at odds with virtually every other country that insists on court orders as a matter of basic due process. The proposal is also a significant outlier in another important respect, however. In most countries, telecommunication providers oppose website blocking, consistent with longstanding and widely held views that they should act as neutral intermediaries that provide carriage rather than play a proactive role of blocking access to online content.
Archive for March 21st, 2018
Episode 127: Lucie Guibault on Canada's Approach to Copyright Term Extension
byMichael Geist

May 2, 2022
Michael Geist
April 25, 2022
Michael Geist
April 11, 2022
Michael Geist
April 4, 2022
Michael Geist
March 28, 2022
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
Why the Government’s New Telecom Policy Directive Means More of the Same for Canada’s Communications Competition Woes
The Unrecognizable Bill C-11: The Online Streaming Act Comes to the Heritage Committee
No Comment: Government Moves to End Debate on Online News Bill Despite a No-Show from Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez
Is the Government Seeking to Short Circuit the Senate Review of Bill C-11?
CRTC Chair Confirms Bill C-11 Captures User Content, Will Take Years to Implement