The series on misleading on fair dealing continues with a post on transactional licensing and Access Copyright’s inexplicable opposition to a licensing system that currently generates millions of dollars in revenue for publishers and authors. Transactional licensing, which involves pay-per-use licences for specific uses not otherwise covered by institutional site licences, collective licences, or fair dealing, is widely used to ensure universities and colleges are compliant with copyright law (prior posts in the series include the legal effect of the 2012 reforms, the wildly exaggerated suggestion of 600 million uncompensated copies each year, the decline of books in coursepacks, the gradual abandonment of print coursepacks, the huge growth of e-book licensing, why site licences offer better value than the Access Copyright licence, my opening remarks to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage).
Archive for November 29th, 2018
Law Bytes
Episode 218: Emily Laidlaw and Taylor Owen on Saving the Online Harms Act
byMichael Geist
November 4, 2024
Michael Geist
October 28, 2024
Michael Geist
October 21, 2024
Michael Geist
September 30, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- Canadian Government to Ban TikTok (the Company not the App)
- Why the Conspiratorial Responses to Canada’s Antisemitism Guide Demonstrate Its Necessity
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 218: Emily Laidlaw and Taylor Owen on Saving the Online Harms Act
- CRTC Approves Google’s $100 Million Online News Act Exemption Deal
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 217: David Fraser on the Privacy Implications of the Federal Court of Appeal’s Facebook Ruling