No related posts.


The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 249: The Debate Over Canada’s AI Strategy – My Consultation Submission and Appearance at the Canadian Heritage Committee
How the Liberal and Conservative Parties Have Quietly Colluded to Undermine the Privacy Rights of Canadians
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 248: Mark Surman on Why Canada’s AI Strategy Should Prioritize Public AI Models
We Need More Canada in the Training Data: My Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage on AI and the Creative Sector
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 247: My Senate Appearance on the Bill That Could Lead to Canada-Wide Blocking of X, Reddit and ChatGPT
Michael Geist
mgeist@uottawa.ca
This web site is licensed under a Creative Commons License, although certain works referenced herein may be separately licensed.
Odd lack of gender balance.
Looks like only 4 are returning members from C-32. What information will the new members miss if previous witnesses aren’t allowed to come back in front of the committee?
http://www.parl.gc.ca/CommitteeBusiness/CommitteeMembership.aspx?Cmte=CC32&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=3
what information will the new members ignore…
… said “What information will the new members miss…?”
I say the committee process here is not to investigate the bill to ensure that the interests of Canadian Citizens are protected. The committee here is Yet Another Rubber Stamp required on the bill before the Majority can ram it through to all our detriment.
Anti-TPM-circumvention laws will only hamper the training of the next generation of geeks and will leave Canada less and less able to compete on technology going forward. We’re being sold down the river, folks, yet again.