While my column this week focused on Canadian ISP transparency, the BBC reports that similar issues have arisen in the UK, where the Ofcom Consumer Panel is trying to address concerns that consumers are being misled about broadband services.
ISP Transparency in the UK
October 10, 2007
Share this post
3 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 268: Sara Grimes on the Moral Panic Behind Banning Kids from Social Media and AI Chatbots
byMichael Geist

May 11, 2026
Michael Geist
May 4, 2026
Michael Geist
April 27, 2026
Michael Geist
Ep. 265 – Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI
April 20, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Slick Videos Won’t Save Lawful Access: Why The Government’s Bill C-22 Defence Avoids the Charter, Privacy and Security Concerns Raised By Critics
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 268: Sara Grimes on the Moral Panic Behind Banning Kids from Social Media and AI Chatbots
U.S. Congressional Leaders Warn Canadian Lawful Access Plans Harm U.S. National Security and Economic Interests
Make It Make Sense: My Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security on Bill C-22’s Lawful Access Plan
Why Social Media and AI Chatbot Bans for Kids Are Bad Policy: Making the Case at the Senate Social Affairs, Science and Tech Committee

BT’s secret child-porn blocklist
Hey, Michael — I’m with you 100 percent on ISP transparency, but I wonder how you square your endorsement of the principle with your support for BT’s secret list of child porn sites, which are silently blocked, assembled in secret, and not subject to public scrutiny or review? I’m a BT customer and I get a LOT of 404s for sites that I can reach on other networks — how much of that is misplaced blacklisting? How do I find out? BT claims it blocks 30,000 calls to its blacklist a day, right? How many of those customers are trying to reach legit sites that have been non-transparently blocked by BT?
BT’s List
Cory,
I don’t believe that I ever endorsed the BT list – I don’t know enough about it to do so. I did (and do) support the Canadian version (Childfind), based on their undertaking to provide appropriate safeguards and oversight. The transparency in this case comes from ensuring that the public is aware of the program, its impact, and appropriate judicial oversight to mitigate against the possibility of misplaced blacklisting.
MG
Misunderstood you, then
Sorry, Michael, I must have misunderstood you earlier; I found out about the list from you during our earlier conversation about the Canadian blacklist; I understood you to be saying that you felt that the success of the BT list was an indicator that the Canadian list would work as well.