Cyndee Todgham Cherniak reports that Canada Border Services opened mail addressed to her office at Lang Michener, raising signficant privacy and client confidentiality concerns.
Canada Border Services Opening Lawyer’s Mail
5 Comments
Recent Posts
The Wrong Ban: The Heritage Committee Backed a Targeted Ad Ban for Kids and Stopped Short of a Social Media Ban, Yet the Government Chose the Reverse 
Regulator First, Rules Later: Bill C-34 Debate Shows the Government Wants a Digital Safety Commission Before It Figures Out What It Will Do 
Making the Case Against Its Own Bill: What the Government’s Bill C-34 Charter Statement Reveals About the Constitutional Vulnerability of the Social Media Ban 
“Position Has Not Changed”: The Canadian Government Reaffirms That Antisemitism Includes Anti-Zionism 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 279: My Keynote on Digital Sovereignty: Control, Choice, and Connection
Constitution-free zones
Borders/customs are “constitution-free zones”, only selected laws apply, and you are essentially at the mercy of the system.
Significant? Hardly
Playing the part of the bogeyman today, Michael? I expect much better from you. Just a lot of “what if”, “may” and “might”. Ms. Todgham Cherniak seems to believe that because she is “a customs lawyer at a prominent Canadian law firm” that she should not be subject to random searches by CBSA. If so, then I’ll be addressing all my international purchases to her attention.
we are vulnerable
Ms. Cherniak’s penultimate paragraph contains a dangerous suggestion. Many US & Canadian government agencies search, flag and/or read e-mail. hackers have no problem getting into e-mail, either.
If clients are using work LANs (i.e., at work) to send messages, they are highly vulnerable. Employers have the right to search messages sent from their systems.
This is not wise advice! Clients are highly vulnerable no matter what they are doing. Blame 9/11 and Homeland Security who have made rules and regs that we must follow, or face the consequences in terms of cross-border transportation and trade.
Her point?
It might be that if they feel free to do this to her on-the-job mail without fear of legal consequences, what of the rights of the rest of us? What of our mail?
What of your own mail?
Fakirs Canada
to Signicant? Hardly re your comments: ” Ms. Todgham Cherniak seems to believe that because she is “a customs lawyer at a prominent Canadian law firm” that she should not be subject to random searches by CBSA. If so, then I’ll be addressing all my international purchases to her attention.”
Why would you want to do that, Hardly? Do you have international purchses you would like to hide from customs?
Re: the rest of your comments, you’re rude, Hardly, but you’re right. Cherniak’s real agenda can only be the promotion of her firm, in my opinion. Only diplomats are immune from searches at customs – and I think that they shouldn’t be immune, either.
Marnie Tunay
http://fakirscanada.spaces.live.com/default.aspx