Cyndee Todgham Cherniak reports that Canada Border Services opened mail addressed to her office at Lang Michener, raising signficant privacy and client confidentiality concerns.
Canada Border Services Opening Lawyer’s Mail
5 Comments
Recent Posts
Back-of-the-Napkin Cultural Policy: The Government’s $600 Million Streaming Plan Copies the CRTC Decision It Killed at More Than Double the Cost 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 282: Udbhav Tiwari on Why Signal May Exit Canada Over Bill C-22’s Encryption and Metadata Retention Rules 
From Making Web Giants Pay to Paying Media Giants: Budget 2026 Replaces the Government’s Internet Platform Strategy With $1.5 Billion in Taxpayer Dollars for Culture and News 
Has the Government Read Its Own Bill? What Three Days of House Debate Revealed About Bill C-34 Before the Committee Hearings Begin 
Surveillance By Design: Government Officials Say Lawful Access Could Reach Gaming Platforms, Daycares and AI Services
Constitution-free zones
Borders/customs are “constitution-free zones”, only selected laws apply, and you are essentially at the mercy of the system.
Significant? Hardly
Playing the part of the bogeyman today, Michael? I expect much better from you. Just a lot of “what if”, “may” and “might”. Ms. Todgham Cherniak seems to believe that because she is “a customs lawyer at a prominent Canadian law firm” that she should not be subject to random searches by CBSA. If so, then I’ll be addressing all my international purchases to her attention.
we are vulnerable
Ms. Cherniak’s penultimate paragraph contains a dangerous suggestion. Many US & Canadian government agencies search, flag and/or read e-mail. hackers have no problem getting into e-mail, either.
If clients are using work LANs (i.e., at work) to send messages, they are highly vulnerable. Employers have the right to search messages sent from their systems.
This is not wise advice! Clients are highly vulnerable no matter what they are doing. Blame 9/11 and Homeland Security who have made rules and regs that we must follow, or face the consequences in terms of cross-border transportation and trade.
Her point?
It might be that if they feel free to do this to her on-the-job mail without fear of legal consequences, what of the rights of the rest of us? What of our mail?
What of your own mail?
Fakirs Canada
to Signicant? Hardly re your comments: ” Ms. Todgham Cherniak seems to believe that because she is “a customs lawyer at a prominent Canadian law firm” that she should not be subject to random searches by CBSA. If so, then I’ll be addressing all my international purchases to her attention.”
Why would you want to do that, Hardly? Do you have international purchses you would like to hide from customs?
Re: the rest of your comments, you’re rude, Hardly, but you’re right. Cherniak’s real agenda can only be the promotion of her firm, in my opinion. Only diplomats are immune from searches at customs – and I think that they shouldn’t be immune, either.
Marnie Tunay
http://fakirscanada.spaces.live.com/default.aspx