Mark Goldberg points to a tabulated response summarizing the interrogatory responses in the CRTC's net neutrality proceeding.
CRTC Net Neutrality Interrogatories
January 20, 2009
Share this post
4 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 274: Mark Musselman on What Stakeholders Really Think About the Government’s Reversal of the CRTC Online Streaming Act Decision
byMichael Geist

June 22, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
The Two Weeks That Reshaped Canada’s Digital Policy
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 274: Mark Musselman on What Stakeholders Really Think About the Government’s Reversal of the CRTC Online Streaming Act Decision
Improv Policy: The Government Doesn’t Know What To Do About Its Online Streaming Act Mess
Soft Ban or Hard Verification Requirement?: Why Bill C-34’s Social Media Ban Exemption Gets the Incentives Wrong and Comes Too Late to Matter
New Rights, New Powers, Long Delays: Bill C-36’s Seven-Step Process for Privacy Reform to Take Effect

Ummmm – so all of the internet providers basically admit they have no idea what percentage of their traffic is made up of P2P packets? Yet they are positive that P2P traffic is a problem. Am I missing something here?
Most of it is filed in confidence to avoid public scrutiny. So, there is definitely a need to get a court order requiring the disclosure of what was filed in confidence.
Public process?
Well, it appears rather clearly that the Canadian Public is not invited in this public process; at least not in a participative way.
Time for war on the oligopoly
The public is being treated with contempt. This behaviour is encouraged by the gov’t. Hopefully the Liberals after their period in the wilderness will turn the CRTC into something other than the joke it has become. The competition bureau is another lame duck organization that needs to be invigorated. If big business wants to be in my pocket i want them tightly regulated. The Ronald Regan era has come to a crashing halt and even the worms are turning.