The annual Glassen Ethics Competition, which is open to high school students in Manitoba, focused on file sharing this year. The winning entry argues society has benefited overall from file sharing.
Manitoba Ethics Essay Competition Winner Tackles File Sharing
February 16, 2010
Tags: copyright / ethics / file sharing / manitoba
Share this post
Episode 168: Privacy Commissioner of Canada Philippe Dufresne on How to Fix Bill C-27
May 29, 2023
May 15, 2023
May 1, 2023
Episode 164: Teresa Scassa on the Latest Canadian Court Ruling on Facebook and What It Might Mean for Privacy Reform
April 24, 2023
Search Results placeholder
- Meta to Test Blocking News Sharing on Facebook and Instagram in Canada in Response to Bill C-18’s Mandated Payments for Links
- Globe Publisher Calls Bill C-18 a “Threat to the Independence of Media” As Government Senate Representative Smears Bill Critics
- Extend the Deadline: My Submission to the CRTC on its Deeply Flawed Bill C-11 Consultations
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 168: Privacy Commissioner of Canada Philippe Dufresne on How to Fix Bill C-27
- CRTC Chair Vicky Eatrides Faces Her First Big Test: Is the Commission Serious About Public Participation on Bill C-11?
Law, Privacy and Surveillance in Canada in the Post-Snowden Era (University of Ottawa Press, 2015)
The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law (University of Ottawa Press, 2013)
From “Radical Extremism” to “Balanced Copyright”: Canadian Copyright and the Digital Agenda (Irwin Law, 2010)
In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law (Irwin Law, 2005) .
Well informed but
A great article, and obviously well researched by the high-school student. He/she is incorrect on one point, however:
“In Canada, downloading copyrighted material for personal use through sharing, aka peer-to-peer networks, is legal.”
Section 80 of the current Canadian law is specifically written about music. That is, it does not specifically allow for downloading TV, movies, etc.
(1) Subject to subsection (2), the act of reproducing all or any substantial part of
(a) a musical work embodied in a sound recording,
(b) a performer’s performance of a musical work embodied in a sound recording, or
(c) a sound recording in which a musical work, or a performer’s performance of a musical work, is embodied
onto an audio recording medium for the private use of the person who makes the copy does not constitute an infringement of the copyright in the musical work, the performer’s performance or the sound recording.
Ummmm, if that’s true, why does Shaw, Bell, Telus, etc. all base their high speed internet campaigns on the speed of downloading movies on to your computer?
Just because the ISPs quote movie download speeds doesn’t mean they are referring to illegal downloads. There are legal download and streaming options in Canada.
Though if the ISPs don’t think for a second that their prospective customers think of illegal sources first when reading the marketing material, they are only kidding themselves.
That is the hypocrisy they profit from.
Incredible it seems like if you ask me ideal combined words and phrases. People added in it using your substantial endeavors as well as unbelievable strategies. We are along the way to master in relation to your own strategies useful for writing services that have accumulated reputation on the net. We would become happy to express a similar experience from my personal cardiovascular. It is pleasant getting together with you.