Canadian lawyers have launched a copyright class action lawsuit against Thomson Reuters. The lawsuit stems from the use of legal documents filed in court proceedings in a database marketed by the company.
Lawyers Launch Copyright Class Action Against Thomson Reuters
3 Comments
Recent Posts
AI Without Canada: Why the Heritage Committee’s AI Report Could Lead to Less Canadian Content in the Training Data 
Addressing the AI Policy Challenge: My Appearance before the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications 
Lawful Access Heads to Committee: The Opposition Found Its Voice, the Government Never Found Its Defence 
Is Data De-Identification Dead?: Why the AI Privacy Risk Isn’t What It Learns, But What It Figures Out 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 265: Jason Millar on Claude Mythos, Project Glasswing, and the Governance Crisis in Frontier AI
And yet, their CCH victory allowing them to copy other people’s material without permission and payment would seem to argue against them on this!
Copyright on court records?
Perhaps something should be done to prevent a private company from profiting from court records, but suing for copyright infringement puts the transparency and accessiblity of the judicial system in jeopardy. Scan and post all court documents on the web. Problem solved.
@Democrat
To a point I agree with you. I would argue, however, that court documents related to anything other than the charges themselves should not be publicly available until after the trial. The reason is to try to ensure jury neutrality. Posting prior to trial could lead to making it more difficult to get a jury.
@Bob: agreed. However, if the publishers of the books in the Law Society library get permission from the legal firms in the first place prior to publishing the references, then arguably the CCH decision doesn’t apply.