The WTO has declined a request from the European Parliament to comment on ACTA, since it currently has no role in the negotations.
WTO Withholds Comment on ACTA
May 13, 2010
Share this post
5 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 273: Rebroadcast of the Globe and Mail’s The Decibel on Canada’s First Steps Towards a Social Media Ban
byMichael Geist

June 22, 2026
Michael Geist
May 25, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Soft Ban or Hard Verification Requirement?: Why Bill C-34’s Social Media Ban Exemption Gets the Incentives Wrong and Comes Too Late to Matter
New Rights, New Powers, Long Delays: Bill C-36’s Seven-Step Process for Privacy Reform to Take Effect
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 273: Rebroadcast of the Globe and Mail’s The Decibel on Canada’s First Steps Towards a Social Media Ban
Midnight Madness: The Government Rushes Lawful Access Bill Through the House Without Debate or a Recorded Vote
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Bill C-36 Modernizes Canada’s Privacy Law, Then Delays It to 2030

…
So what if the WTO has no role?! ACTA is dealing that several things that are directly related with what WTO does. “I” don’t have a role in ACTA, but I comment on it because it directly affects me. The WTO should most definitely comment. Or are they just another sock-puppet in all this?
@Eric L.
In fact I can understand that they declined to comment. Presumably they’ve seen no more of the proposal that what the rest of us have, so what have they to offer that hasn’t already been said? Note that they were asked to provide “expert assessment and analysis of the current provision” of ACTA.
No disrespect intended, you probably can’t provide expert opinion, but neither do you claim to. However, the WTO was asked to do just that. They could provide an opinion, sure, but it would be an opinion based on the last released ACTA text in the context of the WTO treaties. Is that text even valid now? And would they be able to add anything that hasn’t already been said?
RE: Anon-K
Ah, that makes more sense now. Thank-you for clearing that up.
It’s sad though that the WORLD TRADE Organization has no more information about a so called TRADE agreement affecting much of the WORLD then some guy reading MG’s blog. This provides just more evidence that the conception and negotiation of ACTA are completely non-standard and wrong, contrary to what the U.S. or other proponents may say.
http://www.suprastoreshoes.com/ Supra shoes
he WTO has declined a request from the European Parliament to comment on ACTA, since it currently has no role in the negotations.
So wonderful
I appreciate for your post! I hope you will keep it on. http://forestanimals.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/the-extinction-of-forests-animals/
I also want to make friends with you and share my favorite to you. I am focus on you