Katz Submission to the Copyright Board on Access Copyright
November 23, 2010
Tags: access copyright / Copyright Board / katz
Share this post
Episode 160: Peter Carrescia on Why Patents Won’t Solve Canada’s Innovation Problem
March 20, 2023
March 13, 2023
March 6, 2023
February 27, 2023
Episode 156: Senator Paula Simons on Why the Government Should Accept the Senate’s Bill C-11 Fix on User Content Regulation
February 13, 2023
Search Results placeholder
- The Biden Visit to Canada: Why Digital Policy is Emerging as a Serious Trade Tension
- The Government’s Fishing Expedition: Why the Bill C-18 Motion Establishes a Dangerous Precedent For Those Who Dare to Oppose Legislation
- Canadian Chamber of Commerce Warns on Government-Backed Bill C-18 Motion: “A Serious Threat to the Privacy of Canadians”
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 160: Peter Carrescia on Why Patents Won’t Solve Canada’s Innovation Problem
- Government-Backed Motion Demands Disclosure of Years of Third-Party Communications With Google and Facebook in Retribution for Opposing Bill C-18
Law, Privacy and Surveillance in Canada in the Post-Snowden Era (University of Ottawa Press, 2015)
The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law (University of Ottawa Press, 2013)
From “Radical Extremism” to “Balanced Copyright”: Canadian Copyright and the Digital Agenda (Irwin Law, 2010)
In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law (Irwin Law, 2005) .
Thanks for posting this Michael
Ariel Katz really villifies Access Copyright for trying to take away rights granted by parliament, rightly so too.
No, he doesn’t. He claims that the Copyright Board is trying to do this. However, he overlooks the discretion that the Board has in matters of procedure. If, say, 1 million people had filed objections, is anyone seriously saying that each of them will have to participate? The Board can do what is needed to ensure an efficient hearing. That means eliminating obvious duplication, grandstanding, and irrelevant objections. Hearing 50 students is really not going to advance the discussion any more than hearing one student. Basically, they don’t want to pay extra. Tough. Life isn’t fair.
Well put. It goes both ways. The Copyright Board can also deny individual creators who may petition to be heard arguing FOR the tariff on the same basis.
Not disputed. As Katz points out, supporters of a tariff can hardly be objectors.
Wait, is someone here trying to suppress my opinion at the Copyright Board? Why, I oughta…
And if it’s not clear, I agree with Bob. The CB can ignore my letter of support if they feel it doesn’t add anything to AC’s proposal or the deliberations. I respect that.
“If, say, 1 million people had filed objections, is anyone seriously saying that each of them will have to participate?”
Their Government representatives who represent those 1 million people should be allowed to file objections and participate on their behalf. As I recall the Government of Alberta had filed an objection to this tariff and was denied its rights. Why is the public being denied access to participate fully in these hearings? Even Degen was shown the cold shoulder.