The 2012 Olympics and Branding Police
2 Comments
Recent Posts
The Exemption Illusion: Why the Government’s Plan to Fast Track Bill C-34’s Kids’ Social Media Ban Means No Standards, No Privacy Review, and No Enforcement 
Unpacking Bill C-34: My Appearance on the Globe and Mail’s The Decibel Podcast 
Liberal MP: Lawful Access “Has Nothing to Do With the Privacy of People and Their Information” 
The Law to Be Named Later: Bill C-34 Punts 50 Key Decisions to Cabinet and a Digital Safety Commission That Does Not Yet Exist 
Everything All At Once: Bill C-34 Combines Platform Duties, a Kids’ Social Media Ban, AI Chatbot Regulation, and a Powerful Digital Safety Commission Into a Risky “Trust Us” Bet
Some of those restrictions are straight up insane and for athletes to abide by them, well they’ll get what they deserve, 15 min of fame.
I’d really like to see 1/2 of the athletes break the rules and see what the Olympic gestapo does.
Top Android Olympic App removed, saying it infringed Olympic Committee trademarks
I am the developer of an app which was named ‘London Olympics 2012 Ultimate.’ It was top of the list for a while in Google App Market in the Olympics category, and was truly a wonderful app just like its name. It had gained thousands of users, and highest rating, and great reviews. These things are not easy to gain.
However, it didn’t interfere with Olympic Committee branding neither by its logo or by its name. But Olympic Committee complained to Google on some invalid grounds, and Google removed it without even asking me first to comply with the demands of the Olympic Committee.
Olympic Committee said: I used their logo, used term London 2012, and used term The Olympics. These three things are owned by them. However, I didn’t use their logo, I created my own original artwork, which used four rings in different colors, size and arrangement than the official logo to Olympic Committee. I never used the terms The Olympics or London 2012 anywhere in the app.
On the other hand, there are tons of unofficial apps out there using original trademarks and graphic work of the Olympic Committee, including the rings. You can easily find them by searching for ‘Olympics’ at Google Play website.
Now neither Google nor Olympic Committee is replying to my emails which I have been sending them with the proofs that I didn’t violate anybody copyright laws, and even then willing to change the content if that makes Olympic Committee happy.
Now I have uploaded the app once again under a new long name: Follow this year’s UK Olympic. I hope this won’t offend Olympic Committee. However my user base, ratings and reviews are gone.
Don’t you think I was treated unjustly and unfairly, and also singled out because I was on the top providing a good service, whereas many other simpler apps are still out there openly infringing Olympic Committee’s copyrights?
And advise what should I do next to reclaim activation of my old app?