Frank Lenk highlights the dangers of C-61 to the consumer electronics industry in a piece for MarketNews.
Consumer Electronics Industry on Copyright Reform
September 2, 2008
Share this post
One Comment
Law Bytes
Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act
byMichael Geist
April 15, 2024
Michael Geist
April 8, 2024
Michael Geist
March 25, 2024
Michael Geist
March 18, 2024
Michael Geist
March 11, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- Debating the Online Harms Act: Insights from Two Recent Panels on Bill C-63
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act
- AI Spending is Not an AI Strategy: Why the Government’s Artificial Intelligence Plan Avoids the Hard Governance Questions
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 198: Richard Moon on the Return of the Section 13 Hate Speech Provision in the Online Harms Act
- Tweets Are Not Enough: Why Combatting Relentless Antisemitism in Canada Requires Real Leadership and Action
“But experts like Geist have repeatedly urged a balanced approach that ensures payment for content creators without unduly curbing consumers’ ability to enjoy that content…”
This is not correct. Geist has never supported payment for creators. Every post, including each of the C-61 posts, has been in favor of changes that give content away without payment.