Frank Lenk highlights the dangers of C-61 to the consumer electronics industry in a piece for MarketNews.
Consumer Electronics Industry on Copyright Reform
September 2, 2008
Share this post
One Comment

Law Bytes
Episode 275: David Loukidelis on Why Stripping Privacy Enforcement from Canada’s Privacy Commissioner in Bill C-36 is Unnecessarily Risky Policy
byMichael Geist

June 22, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Why Being Locked Out of Frontier AI is The Sovereignty Threat Canada Missed
Blocked Twice: How Bill C-34’s Kids’ Social Media Ban Would Compound the Online News Act’s Harm to Young Canadians’ News Access
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 275: David Loukidelis on Why Stripping Privacy Enforcement from Canada’s Privacy Commissioner in Bill C-36 is Unnecessarily Risky Policy
The Data on Australia’s Social Media Ban: The Better the Privacy Protection, The Less Effective the Ban
Shaky Ground Gets Shakier: What the U.S. Supreme Court’s Location Data Decision Means for Bill C-22

“But experts like Geist have repeatedly urged a balanced approach that ensures payment for content creators without unduly curbing consumers’ ability to enjoy that content…”
This is not correct. Geist has never supported payment for creators. Every post, including each of the C-61 posts, has been in favor of changes that give content away without payment.