The BBC reports on how the UK government turned a single survey in which 136 people indicated they file shared to claim that there are seven million file sharers in the country. Similar exaggerations occured in Canada earlier this year when the Conference Board of Canada relied on a 2006 Pollara survey that extrapolated data from 1,200 people to claim that there are 1.3 billion unauthorized downloads in Canada each year.
How UK Government Spun 136 People Into 7 Million Illegal File Sharers
September 8, 2009
Share this post
2 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 282: Udbhav Tiwari on Why Signal May Exit Canada Over Bill C-22’s Encryption and Metadata Retention Rules
byMichael Geist

November 9, 2026
Michael Geist
November 2, 2026
Michael Geist
October 26, 2026
Michael Geist
October 19, 2026
Michael Geist
August 10, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Back-of-the-Napkin Cultural Policy: The Government’s $600 Million Streaming Plan Copies the CRTC Decision It Killed at More Than Double the Cost
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 282: Udbhav Tiwari on Why Signal May Exit Canada Over Bill C-22’s Encryption and Metadata Retention Rules
From Making Web Giants Pay to Paying Media Giants: Budget 2026 Replaces the Government’s Internet Platform Strategy With $1.5 Billion in Taxpayer Dollars for Culture and News
Has the Government Read Its Own Bill? What Three Days of House Debate Revealed About Bill C-34 Before the Committee Hearings Begin
Surveillance By Design: Government Officials Say Lawful Access Could Reach Gaming Platforms, Daycares and AI Services

And the 136 didn’t even say they were illegally sharing
They presumably included people like myself downloading Solaris and Linux, with the express consent of the owners!
–dave
So what is a more honest figure?
11.6% of households was inflated to 16.3%, pretty much because the researchers felt like it. Next 6.7 million was rounded up. The article doesn’t elaborate on the accuracy of a 1176 sample size survey, maybe a real statistician can elaborate? Would that be within 10% 19 times out of 20 or what?
Obviously the original study didn’t provide a big enough figure (3.9m) so they simply inflated it to match their expectations.