The BBC reports on how the UK government turned a single survey in which 136 people indicated they file shared to claim that there are seven million file sharers in the country. Similar exaggerations occured in Canada earlier this year when the Conference Board of Canada relied on a 2006 Pollara survey that extrapolated data from 1,200 people to claim that there are 1.3 billion unauthorized downloads in Canada each year.
How UK Government Spun 136 People Into 7 Million Illegal File Sharers
September 8, 2009
Share this post
2 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 271: Taking Stock of a Wild Week in Canadian Digital Policy With the Online Streaming Reversal, AI Strategy Release, and Lawful Access Review
byMichael Geist

May 25, 2026
Michael Geist
May 11, 2026
Michael Geist
May 4, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Everything You Wanted to Know About a Kids’ Social Media Ban (But Were Rightly Afraid to Ask): A FAQ on Age Verification and Mandated ID for Everyone
Bill C-22’s Clause-by-Clause Problem: The Government Includes Agencies Seeking Lawful Access Powers But Blocks the Privacy Commissioner’s Return
You Can’t Put the Toothpaste Back in the Tube: Why the Government’s Reported “Temporary” Plan for a Kids’ Social Media Ban Would Mean Mandated ID for Everyone
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 271: Taking Stock of a Wild Week in Canadian Digital Policy With the Online Streaming Reversal, AI Strategy Release, and Lawful Access Review
Canadian American Business Council on Bill C-22: It “Threatens Our Bilateral Partnership on Data Security”

And the 136 didn’t even say they were illegally sharing
They presumably included people like myself downloading Solaris and Linux, with the express consent of the owners!
–dave
So what is a more honest figure?
11.6% of households was inflated to 16.3%, pretty much because the researchers felt like it. Next 6.7 million was rounded up. The article doesn’t elaborate on the accuracy of a 1176 sample size survey, maybe a real statistician can elaborate? Would that be within 10% 19 times out of 20 or what?
Obviously the original study didn’t provide a big enough figure (3.9m) so they simply inflated it to match their expectations.