There was considerable attention yesterday on a media report stating that Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore warned against "radical extremists" opposing C-32.  A video of part of his remarks has now been posted online [full video here]. The comments, which come after the prepared speech, feature a no-holds-barred attack against those arguing for fair copyright.  According to Moore, some proposed amendments to C-32 are not genuine but rather part of an  attempt to oppose copyright and copyright reform, to drum up fear, and to mislead.  Moore encourages confrontation, urging the audience to confront on Facebook, Twitter, talk shows and in the media until "they are defeated."  

I'm under no illusion here. Yesterday, I asked in a post who Moore's "radical extremists" are. The video suggests that he thinks it is me and the thousands of other Canadians who have argued for fair copyright (a reporter at the event reached the same conclusion and CRIA lawyer Barry Sookman is happy to do the same). His comments met with applause from the audience and will be taken as a mandate to continue the astroturfing activities on Balanced Copyright for Canada.

To hear the Minister of Canadian Heritage both discredit the views of so many people and to encourage confrontation as the optimal plan of action is incredibly discouraging.  To use his own words, it is an attempt to mislead, misdirect, and undermine what has been more than a year-long effort for Canadians to speak out on copyright. For those that are interested, my actual take on C-32 is here and some proposed amendments here.  The comments are not dissimilar from many consumer, education, library, business, and creator groups. I see few people who are "absolutists" out there – most want a fair approach but may disagree on precisely where to strike the balance on issues such as digital locks or fair dealing.

Perhaps most troubling is the fact that this is part of a growing trend. Yesterday's comments targeted fair copyright, but we are not alone.  When consumer groups criticize the bill, Moore claims they don't represent consumers and cites support from the Chamber of Commerce instead.  When political opposition parties speak of the need for reform to digital locks provisions, he says they have not put forward amendments.  When creator groups such as ACTRA criticize his approach, he blocks them on Twitter.  When business and education groups express concern about digital locks, he selectively cites their supportive comments instead.  Moore is clearly ready to fight and has urged the few supporters of DMCA-style provisions to do the same.

Read more ›