A CIRA domain name dispute resolution panel has issued the first clear finding of reverse hijacking (essentially a bad faith complaint). The case involved the forsale.ca domain.
CIRA Domain Name Dispute Panel Finds Reverse Hijacking
April 23, 2009
Share this post
2 Comments
Episode 73: The Broadcasting Act Blunder – Why Minister Guilbeault is Wrong
by
Michael Geist

December 14, 2020
Michael Geist
December 7, 2020
Michael Geist
November 9, 2020
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 20: The Case Against Bill C-10
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 19: The Misleading Comparison to the European Union
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 18: The USMCA Trade Threat That Could Lead to Billions in Retaliatory Tariffs
The Broadcasting Act Blunder, Day 17: The Uncertain Policy Directive
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 73: The Broadcasting Act Blunder – Why Minister Guilbeault is Wrong
runescape gold
Buy runescape accounts as low Pirce! We never rest so that we can offer you the best. We’re here 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Get the most out of your game time and level with the best!
Reverse Domain Hijacking Ruling
I find it interesting that it took the better part of a decade for panelists presiding over the Canadian domain name dispute resolution process to return a decision of reverse domain name hijacking and somewhat ironic that they chose to do so in an instance where the complainant actually owned a registered trademark interest in a term that was by any definition confusingly similar. I am not questioning the correctness of the ruling per se, I am merely suggesting that this case may well go down in history as the only case ever to be decided under the CDRP (UDRP or NAF for that matter)in which a decision of reverse domain name hijacking was rendered where the complainant had a certified trademark interest.