With two days left, many organizations are posting their final submissions to the copyright consultation online. Recent postings include:
New Copyright Consultation Submissions of Note
September 12, 2009
Share this post
3 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 270: Roundtable on the Bill C-22 Risks for Canadian Tech Companies Featuring VPN Services Tailscale and Windscribe
byMichael Geist

May 25, 2026
Michael Geist
May 11, 2026
Michael Geist
May 4, 2026
Michael Geist
April 27, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 270: Roundtable on the Bill C-22 Risks for Canadian Tech Companies Featuring VPN Services Tailscale and Windscribe
RCMP Confirms Bill C-22 Concerns: Police Want Law to Provide Access to Encrypted Communications
More Misinformation on Bill C-22 as the Government Struggles to Defend Its Lawful Access Plan
The Phony Phone Book Analogy: How Liberal Cabinet Ministers and MPs are Misleading Canadians About the Privacy Risks of Bill C-22
Apple on Bill C-22: “This Bill Allows the Government of Canada to Force Companies to Break Encryption by Inserting Backdoors into their Products”

Writers Guild just doesn’t get it
Thanks for posting these submissions, Michael.
As usual, though, the Writers guild just doesn’t get it. Their sole focus is that the purpose of copyright law is that the creator of a work has the exclusive right to control the copying of a work and by extension the right to earn revenues from that work.
Their “whole me, me, me” completely ignores all the other purposes of copyright, including having copyright extend only for a LIMITED term – giving the creator some time to exploit the work, but not forever.
Copyright is not there to give creators a lifetime income and we’d all be much better off to use a term of say 20 years, like patents do.
Exactly Robert
It seems the idea of copyright to protect and foster creativity has given way to to a model which encourages a single creative work. I still can’t wrap my mind around how or why an author’s grandchildren should be making money off a book he wrote.
Berne must be renegotiated
It’s that Convention which was the great theft. It was that convention that set the copyright terms at a minimum length of 50 years after the author’s death. And it was that convention which was written by lobbyists, and not by industry or by the public. Funny that.
Joe:
Grandchildren don’t own the works, any art is owned by the publisher as the author has to sign away his ownership of it if he wishes someone to sell it. A minimal set of corporations are the ones who benefit.