With two days left, many organizations are posting their final submissions to the copyright consultation online. Recent postings include:
New Copyright Consultation Submissions of Note
September 12, 2009
Tags: ccer / cfs / copycon / copyright / federation / writers union
Share this post
Episode 168: Privacy Commissioner of Canada Philippe Dufresne on How to Fix Bill C-27
May 29, 2023
May 15, 2023
May 1, 2023
Episode 164: Teresa Scassa on the Latest Canadian Court Ruling on Facebook and What It Might Mean for Privacy Reform
April 24, 2023
Search Results placeholder
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 168: Privacy Commissioner of Canada Philippe Dufresne on How to Fix Bill C-27
- CRTC Chair Vicky Eatrides Faces Her First Big Test: Is the Commission Serious About Public Participation on Bill C-11?
- Ready, Fire, Aim: Eleven Thoughts on the CRTC’s Bill C-11 Consultations
- The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 167: Inside My Senate Committee Appearance on the Many Risks of Bill C-18
- The Government’s Epic Bill C-18 Miscalculation on Mandating Payments for Links
Law, Privacy and Surveillance in Canada in the Post-Snowden Era (University of Ottawa Press, 2015)
The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law (University of Ottawa Press, 2013)
From “Radical Extremism” to “Balanced Copyright”: Canadian Copyright and the Digital Agenda (Irwin Law, 2010)
In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law (Irwin Law, 2005) .
Writers Guild just doesn’t get it
Thanks for posting these submissions, Michael.
As usual, though, the Writers guild just doesn’t get it. Their sole focus is that the purpose of copyright law is that the creator of a work has the exclusive right to control the copying of a work and by extension the right to earn revenues from that work.
Their “whole me, me, me” completely ignores all the other purposes of copyright, including having copyright extend only for a LIMITED term – giving the creator some time to exploit the work, but not forever.
Copyright is not there to give creators a lifetime income and we’d all be much better off to use a term of say 20 years, like patents do.
It seems the idea of copyright to protect and foster creativity has given way to to a model which encourages a single creative work. I still can’t wrap my mind around how or why an author’s grandchildren should be making money off a book he wrote.
Berne must be renegotiated
It’s that Convention which was the great theft. It was that convention that set the copyright terms at a minimum length of 50 years after the author’s death. And it was that convention which was written by lobbyists, and not by industry or by the public. Funny that.
Grandchildren don’t own the works, any art is owned by the publisher as the author has to sign away his ownership of it if he wishes someone to sell it. A minimal set of corporations are the ones who benefit.