A B.C. court has ordered Rogers to stop advertising claims that it has "Canada's Most Reliable" wireless network. The ruling came following a lawsuit launched by Telus challenging the claims.
Court Orders Rogers To Stop Network Reliability Claims
November 25, 2009
Share this post
3 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 275: David Loukidelis on Why Stripping Privacy Enforcement from Canada’s Privacy Commissioner in Bill C-36 is Unnecessarily Risky Policy
byMichael Geist

June 22, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
Why Being Locked Out of Frontier AI is The Sovereignty Threat Canada Missed
Blocked Twice: How Bill C-34’s Kids’ Social Media Ban Would Compound the Online News Act’s Harm to Young Canadians’ News Access
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 275: David Loukidelis on Why Stripping Privacy Enforcement from Canada’s Privacy Commissioner in Bill C-36 is Unnecessarily Risky Policy
The Data on Australia’s Social Media Ban: The Better the Privacy Protection, The Less Effective the Ban
Shaky Ground Gets Shakier: What the U.S. Supreme Court’s Location Data Decision Means for Bill C-22

Excellent!
Now order Rogers (and Bell and Telus) to stop offering sub-par services.
I second that.
Telus should read the small print
This sounds like the pot calling the kettle black.
I am sure that Rogers like Telus has some fine print that limits the claim to something they can defend. e.g. most reliable excludes scheduled and unscheduled outages, months ending in x, cell phones located between 2.34 and 2.37 miles on a bearing of 234 degrees.