Note to Publishers: Your Addiction to DRM is Killing You
3 Comments
Recent Posts
Slick Videos Won’t Save Lawful Access: Why The Government’s Bill C-22 Defence Avoids the Charter, Privacy and Security Concerns Raised By Critics 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 268: Sara Grimes on the Moral Panic Behind Banning Kids from Social Media and AI Chatbots 
U.S. Congressional Leaders Warn Canadian Lawful Access Plans Harm U.S. National Security and Economic Interests 
Make It Make Sense: My Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security on Bill C-22’s Lawful Access Plan 
Why Social Media and AI Chatbot Bans for Kids Are Bad Policy: Making the Case at the Senate Social Affairs, Science and Tech Committee
People have been saying that for a while now. Unfortunately no one wants to listen due to the fear that a loss on control would do to their business model.
Though I do find it highly amusing that their insistence on DRM has come back to bite them.
@Ki
Some know better, just not the “big boys” yet. O’Reilly Media is listed as an example for e-books, though since their market is technical reference books I’m not surprised they “get it”.
Apple started cluing in awhile ago with music. There are a number of smaller video game publishers that try to have DRM free versions available as well.
@BT
Even some of the larger games developers are starting to get it. Ubisoft is backing off on their DRM schemes.
And it’s not even that all DRM is evil. Steam is a DRM scheme, but it’s also a store and an online library of games you own you can download anywhere even if you lose the physical media. You’ll be locked out if Steam goes away at some point in the future, but the convenience of Steam generally make it so many people don’t care. But video games also have multiple different forms of online distribution, and can be played on any computer.
The problem here is that the publishers insisted on DRM, and then got upset when one of the companies used DRM to lock people into their hardware and sold books (at a profit overall, some books would probably have been a loss) with a lower price point than the publishers wanted devaluing the overall price of an ebook to paraphrase the publishers objections (though why an ebook ever needs to cost more than a paperback I don’t really understand). And since they insisted anyone else selling things also had to have DRM, they had the same lock in problem where people who have a Kindle but may want to get books from something other than the Kindle store can’t get them on the Kindle.