My post on the hundreds of submissions to the government’s online harms consultation has garnered significant attention, including a front page news story from the Globe and Mail (I was also pleased to appear on Evan Solomon’s show and the Dean Blundell podcast). The coverage has rightly focused on previously secret submissions such as those from Twitter likening the Canadian plan to China or North Korea and the National Council of Canadian Muslims, who warn that the legislation would have risked constituting “one of the most significant assaults on marginalized and racialized communities in years.” If you haven’t read it, please read my post summarizing some of the key findings or access the entire package that was obtained under the Access to Information Act.
Archive for April 22nd, 2022
Law Bytes
Episode 223: The Year in Canadian Digital Law and Policy
byMichael Geist
December 9, 2024
Michael Geist
December 2, 2024
Michael Geist
November 25, 2024
Michael Geist
November 18, 2024
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
- Why Years of Canadian Digital Policy Is Either Dead (Prorogation) or Likely to Die (Trump)
- New Era and New Risks: Meta’s Content Moderation Reforms and Freedom of Expression Online
- The Year of Disbelief: The Relentless Rise of Antisemitism in Canada
- The Year in Review: Top Ten Michael Geist Substacks
- The Year in Review: Top Ten Law Bytes Podcast Episodes