My post on the hundreds of submissions to the government’s online harms consultation has garnered significant attention, including a front page news story from the Globe and Mail (I was also pleased to appear on Evan Solomon’s show and the Dean Blundell podcast). The coverage has rightly focused on previously secret submissions such as those from Twitter likening the Canadian plan to China or North Korea and the National Council of Canadian Muslims, who warn that the legislation would have risked constituting “one of the most significant assaults on marginalized and racialized communities in years.” If you haven’t read it, please read my post summarizing some of the key findings or access the entire package that was obtained under the Access to Information Act.
Archive for April 22nd, 2022

Law Bytes
Episode 154: The House is Back – A Preview of Canadian Digital Policy as Parliament Resumes
byMichael Geist

January 30, 2023
Michael Geist
January 23, 2023
Michael Geist
January 16, 2023
Michael Geist
December 19, 2022
Michael Geist
December 12, 2022
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
Senate Passes Updated Bill C-11 as Heritage Minister Rodriguez Suggests Government Will Reject Any Amendments that Have an Impact
“This Law Will Be One of Scapegoating All Those Who Do Not Fit Into What Our Bureaucrats Think Canada Should Be”: Bill C-11 is Back with Stunning Rebuke From Senator David Adams Richards
“Ongoing Concerns”: U.S. Objections to Canadian Digital Policies Spreads to the Senate
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 154: The House is Back – A Preview of Canadian Digital Policy as Parliament Resumes
Champagne’s Choice