The Shoestring, a blog run by Magazines Canada, reports that Access Copyright has sent out a message to its members urging them to encourage Industry Minister Jim Prentice to introduce the new copyright bill. Access Copyright claims in the letter that "after a great deal of pressur from a protest group regarding the tabling of this bill (most notably within the blogosphere), the much awaited amendments to the Copyright Act may be put on hold indefinitely."
Access Copyright Claims Copyright Reforms May Be On Hold “Indefinitely”
December 19, 2007
Tags: access copyright / cdmca / Copyright Canada / copyright for canadians / Copyright Microsite - Canadian Copyright / prentice
Share this post
4 Comments

Law Bytes
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 248: Mark Surman on Why Canada's AI Strategy Should Prioritize Public AI Models
byMichael Geist

November 3, 2025
Michael Geist
October 27, 2025
Michael Geist
October 20, 2025
Michael Geist
October 6, 2025
Michael Geist
September 22, 2025
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 248: Mark Surman on Why Canada’s AI Strategy Should Prioritize Public AI Models
We Need More Canada in the Training Data: My Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage on AI and the Creative Sector
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 247: My Senate Appearance on the Bill That Could Lead to Canada-Wide Blocking of X, Reddit and ChatGPT
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 246: Mohamed Zohiri on the Rise and Emerging Regulation of Stablecoins
Senate Bill Would Grant Government Regulatory Power to Mandate Age Verification For Search, Social Media and AI Services Accompanied By Threat of Court Ordered Blocking of Lawful Content

Who told these guys at Access Copyright they weren’t a protest group?
Access Copyright wrote (and I quote without their permission):
“after a great deal of pressur from a protest group regarding the tabling of this bill (most notably within the blogosphere), the much awaited amendments to the Copyright Act may be put on hold indefinitely.”
I see. So their point is that there could only ever have been one copyright act, and only that one piece of legislation should ever be considered? Why assume it could not be modified to a more finely tuned document? Are they saying that copyright changes are now impossible?
Are they telling their members that if any Canadian disagrees with Access Copyright’s point of view, that suddenly no possible changes can ever be brought forth?
It’s always that evil vocal minority of about 30 million Canadians who actually believe they should have a say in what laws are passed.
Problem submitting comments
You have a spinner to let you get another image if you can’t read the text. Whenever I use that button, there is a good chance the page will error out and tell me the text didn’t match (when it did, since I looked for one I could make out clearly).
When I get lucky and have clear text on the first try, it always worked.
CAPT-VOCAL
Hrm whose the vocal minority now eh?
Yah eh?
Perhaps a few more eh’s eh?
GO home american hoseheads, eh?