The Shoestring, a blog run by Magazines Canada, reports that Access Copyright has sent out a message to its members urging them to encourage Industry Minister Jim Prentice to introduce the new copyright bill. Access Copyright claims in the letter that "after a great deal of pressur from a protest group regarding the tabling of this bill (most notably within the blogosphere), the much awaited amendments to the Copyright Act may be put on hold indefinitely."
Access Copyright Claims Copyright Reforms May Be On Hold “Indefinitely”
December 19, 2007
Tags: access copyright / cdmca / Copyright Canada / copyright for canadians / Copyright Microsite - Canadian Copyright / prentice
Share this post
4 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 280: A Fall Update on Where Things Stand on Canadian Digital Policy Reforms
byMichael Geist

October 26, 2026
Michael Geist
October 19, 2026
Michael Geist
August 10, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 280: A Fall Update on Where Things Stand on Canadian Digital Policy Reforms
The Wrong Ban: The Heritage Committee Backed a Targeted Ad Ban for Kids and Stopped Short of a Social Media Ban, Yet the Government Chose the Reverse
Regulator First, Rules Later: Bill C-34 Debate Shows the Government Wants a Digital Safety Commission Before It Figures Out What It Will Do
Making the Case Against Its Own Bill: What the Government’s Bill C-34 Charter Statement Reveals About the Constitutional Vulnerability of the Social Media Ban
“Position Has Not Changed”: The Canadian Government Reaffirms That Antisemitism Includes Anti-Zionism

Who told these guys at Access Copyright they weren’t a protest group?
Access Copyright wrote (and I quote without their permission):
“after a great deal of pressur from a protest group regarding the tabling of this bill (most notably within the blogosphere), the much awaited amendments to the Copyright Act may be put on hold indefinitely.”
I see. So their point is that there could only ever have been one copyright act, and only that one piece of legislation should ever be considered? Why assume it could not be modified to a more finely tuned document? Are they saying that copyright changes are now impossible?
Are they telling their members that if any Canadian disagrees with Access Copyright’s point of view, that suddenly no possible changes can ever be brought forth?
It’s always that evil vocal minority of about 30 million Canadians who actually believe they should have a say in what laws are passed.
Problem submitting comments
You have a spinner to let you get another image if you can’t read the text. Whenever I use that button, there is a good chance the page will error out and tell me the text didn’t match (when it did, since I looked for one I could make out clearly).
When I get lucky and have clear text on the first try, it always worked.
CAPT-VOCAL
Hrm whose the vocal minority now eh?
Yah eh?
Perhaps a few more eh’s eh?
GO home american hoseheads, eh?