The Shoestring, a blog run by Magazines Canada, reports that Access Copyright has sent out a message to its members urging them to encourage Industry Minister Jim Prentice to introduce the new copyright bill. Access Copyright claims in the letter that "after a great deal of pressur from a protest group regarding the tabling of this bill (most notably within the blogosphere), the much awaited amendments to the Copyright Act may be put on hold indefinitely."
Access Copyright Claims Copyright Reforms May Be On Hold “Indefinitely”
December 19, 2007
Tags: access copyright / cdmca / Copyright Canada / copyright for canadians / Copyright Microsite - Canadian Copyright / prentice
Share this post
4 Comments

Law Bytes
Episode 270: Roundtable on the Bill C-22 Risks for Canadian Tech Companies Featuring VPN Services Tailscale and Windscribe
byMichael Geist

May 25, 2026
Michael Geist
May 11, 2026
Michael Geist
May 4, 2026
Michael Geist
April 27, 2026
Michael Geist
Search Results placeholder
Michael Geist on Substack
Recent Posts
AI for All, Details to Follow: Government Releases a Big-Spending AI Strategy That Is Still Short on the Specifics That Matter
New Privacy Rights in the Morning, Mandatory Metadata Retention in the Afternoon: How Bill C-22 Undercuts the AI Strategy Before It Launches
From Making Web Giants Pay to Making Taxpayers Pay: Government Announces Plan to Kill the CRTC’s Online Streaming Ruling
Digital Self-Sabotage: Why Canada’s AI Strategy Is Set to Fail Before it Even Launches
Why Mark Carney’s Antisemitism Speech Did Not Meet the Moment

Who told these guys at Access Copyright they weren’t a protest group?
Access Copyright wrote (and I quote without their permission):
“after a great deal of pressur from a protest group regarding the tabling of this bill (most notably within the blogosphere), the much awaited amendments to the Copyright Act may be put on hold indefinitely.”
I see. So their point is that there could only ever have been one copyright act, and only that one piece of legislation should ever be considered? Why assume it could not be modified to a more finely tuned document? Are they saying that copyright changes are now impossible?
Are they telling their members that if any Canadian disagrees with Access Copyright’s point of view, that suddenly no possible changes can ever be brought forth?
It’s always that evil vocal minority of about 30 million Canadians who actually believe they should have a say in what laws are passed.
Problem submitting comments
You have a spinner to let you get another image if you can’t read the text. Whenever I use that button, there is a good chance the page will error out and tell me the text didn’t match (when it did, since I looked for one I could make out clearly).
When I get lucky and have clear text on the first try, it always worked.
CAPT-VOCAL
Hrm whose the vocal minority now eh?
Yah eh?
Perhaps a few more eh’s eh?
GO home american hoseheads, eh?