Music was a big focus of day one of the Mesh Conference with a keynote from Ethan Kaplan and a panel that included CRIA's Graham Henderson, David Usher, and Arts & Crafts Kieran Roy. Interestingly, the word "copyright" was never mentioned. The Kaplan keynote (liveblog here) focused on the value of "experiencing" music over possessing the "artifact" and pointed to ways that artists can connect with their fan base. Henderson acknowledged that the industry "backed the wrong horse" and that the DRM strategy that restricted the way consumers could enjoy their music wasn't a clever strategy. Left unsaid, however, is that if the commercial strategy was a failure then why is the industry insistent on pursuing a legal reform strategy that is based on what it admits was a mistake?
Music at Mesh
3 Comments
Recent Posts
Back-of-the-Napkin Cultural Policy: The Government’s $600 Million Streaming Plan Copies the CRTC Decision It Killed at More Than Double the Cost 
The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 282: Udbhav Tiwari on Why Signal May Exit Canada Over Bill C-22’s Encryption and Metadata Retention Rules 
From Making Web Giants Pay to Paying Media Giants: Budget 2026 Replaces the Government’s Internet Platform Strategy With $1.5 Billion in Taxpayer Dollars for Culture and News 
Has the Government Read Its Own Bill? What Three Days of House Debate Revealed About Bill C-34 Before the Committee Hearings Begin 
Surveillance By Design: Government Officials Say Lawful Access Could Reach Gaming Platforms, Daycares and AI Services
Er, because, Michael, they are clueless and refuse to think outside the box, maybe? We’re talking Graham Henderson here after all. Not much worthwhile comes from him.
mesh08
Michael
I wonder if the big winner in DRM was to be Microsoft? With a closed source gatekeeper on our computers (media centers) did they have a good chance of being the only route to music and video?
Just wondering.
Denial
I think they’re trying to repeal the free-market axiom that says: When conditions change, companies must adapt or go under.
The internet and all the technology it’s spawned has changed the conditions for these corporate giants radically, in ways they really haven’t come to grips with, mostly because, I think, they grew up in the old near-monopolistic model where they pretty much controlled content, distribution, price, etcetera, and never foresaw that they might have to learn another.
They don’t want to adapt; they can’t, because they don’t know what to do. So instead of accepting that their old business model (pre-DRM, I mean) has failed, they have attempted to get governments to change the rules (tilt the playing field back in their favour, where they seem to feel it was naturally meant to be), so they don’t have to change to a new business model. Because, to repeat, they can’t.