The U.S. Trade Representative is conducting a hearing today on the Special 301 report, its annual list of countries it claims have inadequate intellectual property protections. Several countries will appear alongside many lobby groups. I’ve previously posted on how the report from the IIPA, which represents the movie, music, software and publishing industries, badly misstates Canadian law. Indeed, with recent court decisions, Canada now has one of the toughest anti-piracy rules in the world.
I recently obtained documents under the Access to Information Act that confirm the Canadian government’s rejection of the Special 301 process. Canada will not bother appearing today largely because it rejects the entire process. According to a memorandum drafted for Canadian Heritage Minister Melanie Joly after last years’ report:
The Government of Canada does not recognize the validity of the process as the findings tend to rely predominantly on allegations from U.S. industry stakeholders rather than on objective analysis.
Media lines go even further:
Canada does not recognize the validity of the Special 301 and considers the process and the Report to be flawed. The Report fails to employ a clear methodology and the findings tend to rely on industry allegations rather than empirical evidence and objective analysis.
The full ATIP document can be accessed here.
Pingback: Canada Says It Won't Attend Special 301 Hearing Because USTR Prefers Industry Allegations To Facts And Data | CatsPaw Computer Supplies
Pingback: Canada Rejects Flawed and One-Sided "Piracy" Claims From US Govt. - TorrentFreak
Pingback: Canada Rejects Flawed and One-Sided “Piracy” Claims From US Govt. » Get Enigma TV
Pingback: Canada Rejects Flawed and One-Sided “Piracy” Claims From US Govt. | InternetNews.Space
Pingback: Canada Rejects Flawed and One-Sided "Piracy" Claims From US Govt. - QuoterLand
Pingback: Canada Rejects Flawed and One-Sided “Piracy” Claims From US Govt. | Crypto Cabaret
its really nice article…
Pingback: Panel Rejects Eli Lilly Claim Over Canadian Patent Law, Orders Company to Pay Millions in Costs - Michael Geist